War Eagle Extra has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 4 seconds. If not, visit
http://www.wareagleextra.com
and update your bookmarks.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Remember Jerrell Powe?

He was committed to Auburn at one point about three years ago. Of course, I believe he committed to every school in the SEC before finally settling on Ole Miss at the end. Well, you may or may not have followed his struggle to gain eligibility after failing to qualify for SEC competition on numerous occasions. It appears that he may finally be preparing to play as a partial qualifier, something the SEC has historically not allowed.

You can read more about the whole saga in this lengthy blog explanation.

Mike Slive didn't mention any names, but he discussed the situation today in his opening remarks at Media Days. In fact, he went out of his way to NOT name names:
"It is inappropriate to associate this legislative change with any individual student-athlete or prospective student-athlete," he said.

Yeah, right. They might as well call this the Jerrell Powe corrolary.

Here's the portion from Slive's remarks that addressed partial qualifiers. Basically, he reserves the right to let them in, but it's gonna take some work on their part:
"There has been confusion about a recent amendment that the conference made to its bylaws with respect to student athlete eligibility, with some reports indicating the conference has relaxed its academic standards. In fact, the opposite is true. I want to take this opportunity to clear up that confusion.

"As you may know, and some of this is more than a lot of you want to know, the NCAA revised its bylaws several years ago to eliminate the status known as partial qualifier, leaving only two classes of student athletes: qualifier and non qualifier, which are determined based on a student athlete's high school academic credentials.

"This spring, the conference revised its bylaws effective August the 1st of this year to maintain standards more stringent than the NCAA standards governing the enrollment of non qualifiers. In addition to modifying the labels describing a student athlete's initial eligibility status, the NCAA's initial eligibility index was extended to include the full range of possible standardized test scores. A 2.0 high school GPA was established as the minimum for a student athlete to be a qualifier, and the number of required high school core courses was increased, first from 13 to 14, and now to the new requirement of 16.

"It is inappropriate to associate this legislative change with any individual student athlete or prospective student athlete. Rather the revision is based on the need to update SEC rules to properly reflect new NCAA standards and to ensure accommodation of individuals challenged by learning disabilities.

"These revised bylaws, known to most of us as Proposal 1, make it clear that only a limited number of recruited student athletes who are non qualifiers at the time of enrollment at an SEC institution may become eligible to compete in the SEC and that each of those limited number of student athletes may become eligible only if he or she presents an average high school GPA of at least 2.0 as certified by the NCAA and at least 12 core courses. The institution submits a special report to the conference known as Proposal 9A, and a prospective student athlete who was a non qualifier and who does not meet these standards can enroll as a first year student in the SEC at an institution in our league, but cannot later become eligible for SEC competition.

"Another path to eligibility is available for such a student athlete, however. He or she can enroll in junior college and become eligible as a transfer student. For those interested in more, we have prepared a document comparing the old and new provision of SEC Bylaw 14.3, and that's available to you outside on the table after we finish."

I imagine that's more than you'd ever want to read about the process, but it could be of great importance going forward. It will be interesting to see how the league deals with some of the kids in situations like Powe's. How do you let one in and not the next? It could become a mess.

No comments: